Anthropological Musings and Concepts
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Fun Fact Friday's
  • Human Evolutionary Tree
  • Labeled Human Skeleton
  • Contact
  • About

Sexual Dimorphism

3/6/2016

0 Comments

 
       Sexual dimorphism is a term which means the difference between the male and female of a species. In a previous blog (http://anthropologicalconcepts.weebly.com/blog/male-or-female) I discussed how the skeleton of male and female differentiate, which is a form of sexual dimorphism, but a very small percentage of it (about 1%). In humans male and female also differ slightly in physical appearance; from amount of hair to amount of musculature. But what of other hominids? In the following blog I will discuss the difference between male and female non-human primates. I first want to speak of those whose sexual dimorphism is evident, then to those with whom it is not so evident.
​       Our first non-human ape is the orangutan. This is an ape who inhabits Borneo, Malaysia, and Sumatra, Indonesia, and whose method of locomotion is sometimes travel on the ground, but their more common locomotion is brachiation (climbing trees) so both males and females have arms longer than their torsos. Aside from the arms and the colour of their hair (orange), they could not be more different. The male orangutan has body mass more than twice than that of females, and with that they are also larger and heavier. They also have larger canines and first lower premolars (refer to: http://anthropologicalconcepts.weebly.com/blog/-diet-and-teeth). But even though these are all immediately evident that the larger ones are males, but there is one element that removes all doubt. This element are the large cheek pads; only male orangutans have these (image below). Something that helps in this huge difference is when the female hits adulthood, they stop growing, while the male still grows. That said, when orangutans are babies, it is difficult to tell apart the males and females. 
Picture
       With orangutans they do not have an alpha male, unlike the next ape I will address; the gorilla. This ape lives either in a small section of lowlands or of mountains of Africa; the latter being lowland gorillas and former being mountain gorillas. Unlike the orangutans who spend little time on the ground, gorillas spend much time on the ground. That said, their method of locomotion is that of quadrupedal knuckle walkers. In the community of the gorilla, there is one alpha male, known as a silverback, a few females, and their offspring. Their packs consist of about 10 individuals. In contrast to the male orangutans, male gorillas do not have cheek pads, but the sexual dimorphism in them is just as noticeable. Female gorillas generally weigh between 154 lb (70 kg) or 198 lb (90kg), while male gorillas come in at 440 lb (200 kg) (image below for comparison). 
Picture
       We now switch to apes whose sexual dimorphism is not as great as the two I have just addressed. The first I will speak of might as well be a cousin to us humans, which is the chimpanzee. Even though their form of locomotion is quadrupedal knuckle walkers like the gorillas, they also comfortably climb trees. Chimpanzees live in tropical forests and bordering savannas. And unlike the gorillas they do not several female partners, they form monogamous mating bonds in a community numbering from 10 to 50 individuals. Humans and chimpanzees do not differ much, and sexual dimorphism is one of things we have in common with them. I am not saying that we have the same sexual dimorphism but we have small differences between our males and females. The average weight for a male chimpanzee is 88.2 to 132 lb (40 to 60 kg) and for the average female chimpanzee is 70.5 to 104 lb (32 to 47 kg), which is nowhere near the difference between male and female gorillas. As for the size both female and male chimpanzees tend to be about the same height, but the females are less muscular, like humans. 
Picture
       The last ape I will speak of are the gibbons. These apes inhabit southeast Asia. Like the orangutans, gibbons also use brachiation as a form of locomotion, but unlike the orangutans, they are much smaller and slender, so they are able to walk bipedally on top of branches. These apes, like the chimpanzees, are monogamous (this includes forming a nuclear family which is two mated adults with their juvenile offspring). Now, unlike the three apes I have spoken of, which are classified as part of the “great apes,”gibbons fall under the classification of “lesser apes” (or “smaller apes). At the average height for all gibbons, male and female, being at 3 ft, this is understandable. Just like the chimpanzees the sexual dimorphism is not great; if anything it is less than that of the chimpanzees. The average male gibbon weights 12.3 lb (5.6 kg) and the average female weights 12.7 lb (5.8 kg). So both male and female gibbons weight pretty much the same. Now there is a species of gibbons known as siamangs, which hold the biggest male gibbons weighing between 15 lb (7 kg) and 30 lb (13.5 kg).
Picture
       It is amazing how much apes vary, from human to gorilla. Brachiation is a rare ability for primates (only a few New World monkey species have that as well). As for the quadrupedal knuckle walking, only the chimpanzees and gorillas have shown this skill. But the form of locomotion is probably all the chimpanzees and gorillas share in common; along with the orangutans and gibbons, the only thing they share in common is brachiation. What is more, of the apes I have addressed in this blog, one is the biggest ape species (gorillas), along with the smallest (gibbons). But that said, we are all family, we are all apes.
​       
Please feel free to comment on what you thought of the blog, or other physical anthropological subjects you would like me to cover.
                                                                 (from left to right: human, gorilla, chimpanzee, orangutan, gibbon)
Picture
0 Comments

Mummification VS. Fossilization  

2/21/2016

1 Comment

 
       In a previous blog I spoke of ancient Egyptians and how they mummified their pharaohs (http://anthropologicalconcepts.weebly.com/blog/-are-you-my-mummy), and briefly spoke of how the elements could mummify dead bodies. That said, why do we not have mummified Australopithecus or Neanderthals? In the following blog I will discuss how the environment has to be just right to mummify or to fossilize.
​       The most famous case of mummification is in ancient Egypt, but that was a process that took much time. In several cases there is such a thing as accidental mummification. An example of this accidental mummification are the “Greenland Mummies.” In 1972 a group of a six month old baby, a two year old boy, and six women were found in a shallow cave, and three women found in a second grave that dated back to 1475 c.e. It seemed to be meant as a mass family grave because after their DNA was studied it was found that all, except one, were related (it is theorized the one that did not have DNA in common was family by marriage). All of who was buried were dead before placed there, that is everyone but the six month old baby (image below), who "was found to have Down’s Syndrome and may have been left out to die of exposure because of his condition," also his mother had died earlier, so there was no one to watch over him. These bodies were mummified naturally by two factors. First was the temperature, which was sub-zero, and second were the winds. When there is wind in sub-zero temperatures it is a dry, dehydrating wind (image below). So, in a sense, the six month baby was mummified alive. In my blog about human soap (http://anthropologicalconcepts.weebly.com/blog/-human-soap), I described how bog bodies are formed. They are another example of accidental mummification. 
Picture
Picture
       Now in my mummy blog I said “When you live in a country where most of it is dry and sandy, it is very easy to get mummified by the elements,” of which I was speaking of Africa. It is easy to get distracted from the Africa in our recorded history and to think that it has always been the way. If it had always been that way, then all the fossils that are not found in the deserts or dry environments would have been mummified, so...how? Well, the key words that I have just said “our recorded history.” The history of which the fossils of early hominids that were fossilized came from a more fertile Africa. There are many fish, plant, animal, and hominid fossils in areas in which are now just sand. This means it had to have been just right for these fossils to form. For a fossil to form you need for the organism to be buried quickly under sand, earth, mud, or volcanic ash. Once buried, and as time passes, layer after layer of earth is accumulated (this is where stratigraphy comes in), and before you know it, a million years have passed, and they are being excavated by paleontologists or paleoanthropologists if they are hominid (paleontologists study extinct animals, while paleoanthropologists study human evolution). “The heat and pressure from being buried in sediment can sometimes cause the tissues of organisms — including plant leaves and the soft body parts of fish, reptiles and marine invertebrates — to release hydrogen and oxygen, leaving behind a residue of cardon” (and this is where carbon dating comes in). 
       But what happened to all of our evolutionary ancestors that they were able to be fossilized? They could have drowned and their body deposited in the water bed covered by sediment (this one is ideal), they could have suffocated on ash during a volcanic eruption, or just buried (there is evidence that pre-historic hominids buried their dead). That said, most of the dead we have buried through the ages probably have begun to fossilize (the caskets rot away leaving the body, or what is left of it, to the earth).Yet, even though mummification and fossilization look completely different in the outcome, they are in the end, fossilized.
       
Please feel free to comment on what you thought of the blog, or other physical anthropological subjects you would like me to cover.
1 Comment

Evolution of Anthropologists

2/14/2016

0 Comments

 
       Most things we know about our species, Homo sapiens, have come from at least one area of anthropology; whether it be cultural, archaeology, linguistics, or physical, all these are part of who we are. Modern anthropologists go to great lengths to get information for the masses. They participate, they observe, they participate and observe, or organize and conduct digs. It seems like they are an active bunch, but it was not always this way; or it is better to say it began that way but then shifted.
       The man who is seen as the Father of American (U.S.) Archaeology is also the Father of the Declaration of Independence; Thomas Jefferson. He had always been interested in the Native Americans of Virginia. “
Jefferson studied and made note of the similarities and differences between over forty tribal languages in Virginia.” Unfortunately most of those notes were lost when a wagon transporting his belongs from the White House to Monticello was ransacked. But this linguistic study was just the start to his curiosity. He had learned of mounds located in Virginia, and one in his neighbourhood, which he was determined to open and examine thoroughly. His notes on the excavations were very detailed; I am tempted to say that he did a better job with the Native American mounds than Howard Carter with King Tut. “Jefferson wrote that the mound was 'of spheroidical form, of about 40 feet diameter at the base, and had been of about twelve feet altitude...I first dug superficially in several parts of it, and came to collections of human bones, at different depths, from six inches to three feet below the surface.'” The key words in this are “I...dug.” He was willing to do the hard work to satisfy his curiosity. Even though, in Jefferson's era, archaeologists were seen as digging and so on a hobby (Speculative Period, 1492 – 1840), in everything he did was so meticulous, he was a practicing field archaeologist. (below: on the left is a mammoth tooth fossil Jefferson found; on the right is an example of a Native American burial mound.)
Picture
Picture
       Although, in the late 19th early 20th centuries there was a huge change in how anthropology was done. I would go as far to say that it really was not done. Sure there were scholars and anthropologists working, but they were working from the comfort of their homes, not going out into the field to gather information or to see events with their own eyes and draw from that; these types of anthropologists are called “arm-chair anthropologists” because they would just sit and speculate. It is enough to say that the Speculative Period should have been this period. They would go through artifacts that were brought or sold to them and just make conclusions or using their imagination on what they had in front of them. Even though E.B. Tylor founded cultural anthropology in this time period, it lead to racism and ethnical stereotypes. It was a dark time for anthropology. The reason I say this is because being an anthropologist is to make assessments with the leg work, not without it.
       Modern anthropologists do just that, they go do the research for themselves. They go to different states for research with like minded anthropologists, they go to completely different countries to observe other cultures, they go to isolated areas to dig, sometimes with just a party of five people including them. For physical anthropologists, the dig is something we look forward to; because if we are digging that means we are digging towards something. But to get the funds to go dig is a totally different story; you needs grants and definite proof that the excursion will be worth it. But even though going to different countries for research is the epitome for an anthropologist (besides getting published), just going to the next state over to broaden your knowledge or research qualifies as leg work. Just do not make assumptions and conclusions from a computer or television screen while sitting comfy on your chair. If you condense what an anthropologist
has to do, it is leg work...and publication.
       
Please feel free to comment on what you thought of the blog, or other physical anthropological subjects you would like me to cover.
0 Comments

The Worries of Bones

2/7/2016

0 Comments

 
       We like to think bones as part of the body that just needs a lot of calcium, and when you get older, more care. If you are your everyday human, you go to school or work, come home, and have family time; your bones never cross your mind. But what about those whose bones are in danger every time they do their job? For example, those who participates in sports. I am sure their minds are on the game, and not on their bones; they must think that their outfits will protect them. But...what happens when it does not do the job? In the following blog I will address the most common sports breaks.
​       If you have taken a look at the section of this website titled “Labeled Human Skeleton (http://anthropologicalconcepts.weebly.com/labeled-human-skeleton.html),” you have seen how many bones look like they are prime to be broken if not protected. The most common bone that is broken will take you by surprise (it surprised me); it is the clavicle. But after researching how it can fracture it does not seem so surprising. It is settled between the manubrium and scapula, and in reality it is just floating there. If the actual clavicle is hit with enough force it will, of course, break, but there are other ways it can fracture. For example if someone is tackled or hits the ground with enough force on their side, that force could cause pressure on the clavicle and in turn cause it to break. And landing on the side with the arm close to the body or extended over the head, both can cause a clavicle to fracture. 

Picture
       Now we have broken arms, but an arm is made up of three bones, humerus, radius, and ulna. Just like the clavicle, and for other bones I will speak of, the major deciding factor for a bone to break is pressure. If the pressure is just too much, it will give in. In football, for example, they constantly use their arms to clear their path and to defend the ball (“Fall on an outstretched arm, often during sports or from a height” can cause both the ulna and radius to break; the area of the radius closest to the thumb is what usually breaks resulting in a broken wrist). When the arm is in a defense position, the ulna is the bone that gets the beating, and when they are pushing their way through, it is the humerus. Humeral fractures can be proximal (closer to the top), distal (closer to the bottom), or to the shaft. A proximal fracture has the highest percentage. Just like with the ulna, a fall or a direct hit can cause it to break. 
Picture
Picture
       Next we have the calcaneus. Seeing how much running is done in sports it is no surprise that this is a bone that is one of the commonly broken ones. Even if you do not participate in sports, just taking a wrong step or a bad fall from your bike can cause a broken calcaneus. “In some cases when you twist an ankle you might think you have something like a sprain, but broken ankles and sprains can seem similar.” The sports in which these are common are soccer, football, basketball, and rugby. Another bone, or bones that are also in your foot are at a high risk of fracture, these are the phalanges of the foot. Seeing how close to 25% of your bones are in your feet, it is not surprising to see the toes on this list. The bones of the feet are strong, strong enough to support us when running, walking, jumping, doing anything that requires locomotion. Of these bones, the phalanges and calcaneus are very exposed. In sports that require kicking, like football or soccer, this is common. But it is also common in basketball and ballet. In ballet it seems to be a normal occurrence due to stress these small bones undergo when they take certain poses. 
Picture
Picture
       The next bone is most commonly broken in contact sports, like boxing, football, and rugby, that is the nasal bone. With this one, just like the calcaneus, you do not have to participate in these sports to have a broken nose. Just being in a fight that someone takes a swipe to your face, or falling on your face can easily break this bone. Unlike the rest of the skull, which is make up of thicker bone, the nasal bone is thinner and unluckily, more prominent than the rest of your skull. “Fractures often cause the nose to become misshapen as well as resulting in pain and swelling; a person may also have difficulties with breathing and a black eye.” With a broken nose, it is lucky that the orbit sustains no damage; although, again, depending on the force of the hit, it just may. 
Picture
       You may have noticed that neither the tibia, fibula, or femur were amoung the ones I have spoken of, with good reason. The femur is the strongest bone in the body that can withstand 160 PSI (pound-force per square inch), and is stronger than steel (not to mention much more malleable). So when you put pressure on the femur, it takes most of it to keep the tibia and fibula with less pressure. When playing sports, or just going about your everyday life, I think it is important to take your bones into account. Because, as you have just read, they can fracture, some with intent some by just taking the wrong step. This goes out to all my readers; I hope you never have to go through the pain of a broken bone, mostly because the time can vary with what kind of fracture is sustained. Below are examples of different fractures and their names.
Picture
“Transverse fractures go more or less straight across the bone.
Oblique fractures are diagonal breaks across the bone.
Spiral fractures happen when one or both halves of the bone are twisted.
Comminuated fractures break the bone into more than two pieces.
Avulsion fractures mean pieces of the bone have been pulled apart.
Impacted fractures are the opposite of avulsion fractures. These happen when a piece of bone is pushed down into another piece of bone.
Fissure fractures are cracks in the bone.
Greenstick fractures happen when the bone bends and breaks partially, but not completely."

       Please feel free to comment on what you thought of the blog, or other physical anthropological subjects you would like me to cover.

0 Comments

Homo erectus pekinensis

1/31/2016

0 Comments

 
       Or more wildly known as Peking Man. This hominid was found in Zhoukoudian (which is a cave system), Beijing, China. The primary excavation and discovery of the majority of bones found was in 1929 – 1937. This discovery was the largest collection of Homo erectus ever found with 45 individuals; mostly remains of women and children. The bones that were found were six complete or nearly complete skulls, 14 cranial fragments, six facial fragments, 15 jawbones, 157 teeth, one clavicle, three humeri, carpal bones, seven femurs, and one tibia. Now even thought I said the primary excavation was in the early 1900's, in 1966 two cranial fragments were found that fit two other which were found in 1934 and 1936; this gave us the sixth skull. This collection of bones is what is referred to as “Peking Man.” (It once was the largest collection found at one site, that is until Homo naledi. http://anthropologicalconcepts.weebly.com/blog/-first-week-and-a-physical-anthropological-surprise, but it still is the largest collection of Homo erectus ever found) At first the age of the bones was put as between 200, 000 and 300, 000 but now, after dating has been done on sediments in which they were found, it is believed that they are 400, 000 and 670, 000 years old.
       Stone tools, of course, were also found. It is actually the finding of quartz deposits that were not native to the area that had them looking for who was responsible for bringing them to the cave. Just like the large number of bones that were found, there were also a large number of stone tools. There was “evidence” of a controlled fire and it was thought that Peking man was cannibalistic because of how the bones had been torn to get to the brains and bone marrow. But now, even though there were many stone tools found, many archaeologists and anthropologists believe that they did not reside in the cave where they were found, they were eaten in the cave they were found, and not by other Homo erectus.
       
After seeing how the bones were broken into to get to the meat, it was suggested that if they were cannibalistic it would have been done more precise. Part of a femur had surface etching from stomach acid, which means whatever ate them, regurgitate it. Not only were bones of Homo erectus found, but also those of giant hyenas (Pachycrocuta), which gave the anthropologists the idea to observe how modern hyenas would do with bones. Just like how the long bones of the Homo erectus were broken is how the hyenas would break into long bones to get to the bone marrow. Also, because of the thickness of the actual cranium it is thought the Pachycrocuta chewed through the face “gaining a purchase on the bone surrounding the foramen magnum (the opening in the cranium where the spinal cord enters).” They would then just scrape and chew until the bone cracked open or made an opening large enough to expose the brain. This is why some anthropologists believe the skull bases were destroyed.
Picture
       In 1937 the excavating had to come to an end because of the Japanese invasion and the start of World War II. To make sure the bones that had been excavated were kept safe, seeing how in days before the invasion they had expressed interest in them, Franz Weidenreich, who was studying the Peking Man fossils, planned to send them to the United States to the Museum of Natural History. “...each fossil was wrapped in white tissue paper, cushioned with cotton and gauze, and then wrapped again in stouter paper. These packages were placed in a small wooden box, which was in turn padded and placed with other boxes inside large wooden crates.” They got to the U.S. Embassy, and when there they were entrusted to Colonel William Ashurst who was to claim them as his personal belongings. A party of nine marines were to guard these boxes on a train the next morning that was to take them to a ship which was waiting. But the train never made it to the ship as it was intercepted by Japanese troops. “The marines were sent to prison camps, their ammunition and military equipment was seized, and the fossils were never seen again.”
       Luckily, before the bones were even packed up Weidenreich had casts made of them. The search for the original fossils is still in effect. In the 1970's a woman claimed to have them, and sent a photo, but none looked like those which were missing. There was a cranium in the top right corner of the photograph that could have been one of the missing. She demanded a $500,000 for their return, but she disappeared soon after without claiming the money. To this day, no one knows where these bones are. They could be in someones private collection, or buried under some faraway highway. But either way, it is saddening that these pieces of our past are still missing.

​       Please feel free to comment on what you thought of the blog, or other physical anthropological subjects you would like me to cover.
0 Comments

Instruments of Death

1/24/2016

0 Comments

 
       Music is one the vital parts of our everyday life. Whether it be background music of a program to make us feel certain emotions, listening to your own preferred genre, or just humming a tune, music has been a huge part of our lives. Music is seen as an art, a form of expression, or entertainment, and being human we love to express ourselves and to be entertained. In the caves of France we have seen prehistoric art, but what of prehistoric music? In the following blog I will discuss prehistoric instruments, what they were made of and where they were found.
​       
Given that in prehistoric times they did not have steel or special gears we have for modern instruments, they made due with what they had. The earliest instrument that has been found is that of a flute some made of bird bone or mammoth ivory (image below). These were also found in cave, but instead of France it was found in southern Germany. Using carbon dating these flutes date back to between 42,000 and 43,000 years old. You could argue that the holes of the flute were made by the teeth of an animal, but that would not explain the ivory flutes. Bone is hollow to allow room for bone marrow (the marrow makes red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets), but ivory is not. For prehistoric man (they were made by Homo sapiens), to make an ivory flute took time and intent. The finger holes vary between 3, 5, and 8. Compared to the 6, 8, and 11 finger holes modern flutes have, you would think the “music” that these prehistoric flutes made was just noise, but “the 18.7-centimetre-long flute, which is carved from mammoth ivory, has three finger holes and would have been capable of playing relatively complex melodies.” 
Picture
Picture
       After the invention of the flute, prehistoric man was very proud of it. What I mean by this is on cave paintings, carvings, or statues, the figure is playing a flute. In the image below you cannot see anyone playing a flute, but it appears that they are dancing; and dancing is usually paired with music. The most famous prehistoric flute player is probably the Kokopelli (image below). This figure dates back over 3,000 years ago, and is most likely older than the ancient Egyptian civilization. It is a fertility deity that is shown with a humpback and a flute in their hands. Kokopelli can be “found throughout the mountains, deserts, and high plains of the southwestern United States,” seeing that it was mostly used by the native American cultures. 
Picture
Picture
       Even though using bones as instruments sounds barbaric, we still use them to this day. It is not as well known as a flute, but it is thought to have roots in Egypt or China. The instrument is called Bones, or when using spoons, Spoons. The image below from the mid 1800's shows a man, William Sidney Mount, playing it. That might be a record from many decades ago, but there are still avid Bones users (video below). It is so strange to think something we know have awards for, something we sing to children, something we use to calm or entertain us, can be dated almost as far back as our origins. It seems as if our music has evolved with us and some believe it may have helped us evolve...and survive. 
​       
Please feel free to comment on what you thought of the blog, or other physical anthropological subjects you would like me to cover.
Picture
0 Comments

Marfan Syndrome: Now and Then

1/17/2016

0 Comments

 
       We, who live in the United States, all know of the 16th president, Abraham Lincoln. We know of what he did, how he died, who killed him, but that is where they cut off who he was when teaching his life in schools. But there may have been a huge part of his life that is never addressed in the classroom, and to learn of it you would have to know what to look for. This part of his life was called Marfan syndrome, and that is what this blog will speak of.
​       
First, what is Marfan syndrome? Marfan syndrome is defined as “a hereditary disorder of connective tissue, resulting in abnormally long and thin digits and also frequently in optical and cardiovascular defects.” In layman's terms it means to have “greater than average height, long arms and legs, eye problems, and enlargement of the aorta.” The actual definition is what the symptoms of Marfan syndrome consist of. Since Lincoln was a president and as such, was not open about his personal problems, it is possible he has Marfan Syndrome, which is why I said “there may have been” earlier. But many scientists agree that it is more than likely he had Marfan syndrome. 
Picture
       As I said before, Marfan syndrome is a disorder that is inherited. But even though a parent has to have the disorder, 25 percent of those who have Marfan syndrome have it because of a new mutation that spontaneously develops. It also affects male and female of any ethnicity equally, but it is more dangerous in females. Reason being is if she gives birth. A part of Marfan syndrome has to do with the heart, the aortic valve to be precise. When a female with this disorder is giving birth she risks her aorta rupturing. The rupture of the aorta is a common cause of death in those with Mafan syndrome.
​       Now Marfan syndrome is by no means a new disorder. We actually have evidence that dates back to Egypt's New Kingdom; 1352 – 1334 BCE to be exact. During this time ruled a very controversial, at least in his time, pharaoh under the name of Akhenaten. He is most famous for changing the religion of Egypt from many to one, and for who he was married to; Nefertiti. Early in his rule, we can see a uniformity of the length of his face with the pharaohs that came before him, but that quickly changed as he became settled as pharaoh. From the statues to the art on the walls we could see his long limbs and face. Probably the most famous wall art is him and Nefertiti playing with their children (image below). But Nefertiti is also shown to having long limbs, so these can not be seen as trust worthy, right? 

Picture
       Even though in this artwork all who are shown have his disorder, but in others that are actual statues, you can clearly see it in his face; and one has him sitting across Nefertiti, with him having an elongated face while her face is not (image below). There is no evidence that Nefertiti had Marfan syndrome, but perhaps the representation of his children were as true as they could be, because they most likely inherited it. At first it was suggested that he had Froehlich's Syndrome because he had feminine features, but that is all that fit in with that theory (other signs of Froehlich's Syndrome was short stature and retardation of which Akhenaten did not show), and Marfan syndrome fits him to a T.
Picture
Picture
       It is so interesting to know that some disorders we have nowadays, existed so far in the past. I do not see an end to the disorder that is Marfan syndrome. Even if those with it were to stop reproducing, there is always the risk of the spontaneous mutation. Seeing how the earliest sign of Marfan syndrome was 3,368 years ago, there is not even a point of origin we can refer to.
​       Please feel free to comment on what you thought of the blog, or other physical anthropological subjects you would like me to cover.

Picture
Picture
0 Comments

Human Genome Project

1/10/2016

0 Comments

 
       The Human Genome Project was something that was decades in the making, beginning in 1985, and completed in 2003. It was all over the news and every scientist and scientific journal were speaking of it, but, just what was the Human Genome Project? The purpose of the Human Genome Project was, and is, to identify all the genes in human DNA, store this information in databases, improve tools for data analysis, DNA Forensics, and risk assessment. That said, what is “risk assessment?”
​       Risk assessment is a term used when looking at a list of risks someone has to contract a disease. The Human Genome Project looked at inherited genes. For example, Tay-Sachs disease. This is a disease that slowly destroys the brain of an infant. This happens when there is an increase of fatty acid in the nerves of the brain. The reason for this is because there is one bad letter in their genetic make-up. Both parents, meaning that both must have it, is how Tay-Sachs is inherited. (example below) A practice named gene therapy, “Gene therapy is an experimental technique that uses genes to treat or prevent disease” has been proposed, but has been proved to need much work. Reason being is because of our immune systems response to the therapeutic DNA.Since it is not found in the body of the host, the immune system immediately attacks it. The immune system also has a form of memory, so if the therapeutic DNA is reintroduced into the body, the immune system will know immediately what to do.
Picture
       That said, there is another project that works with the information the Human Genome is gathering under the name “Iceland Genetic Database” project. The Iceland Genetic Database project is about working with information about the human genes that cause common diseases. The purpose of the project is to produce better drugs and to look for cures for diseases using the information they obtain about human genes. They plan to go about doing this by using the family trees of certain people in Iceland. Because of extensive backgrounds on all of the inhabitants of Iceland they can look to see who in an individuals family would have contributed to a certain disease. Thus coming closer to finding out how to create a cure. A company named deCODE Genetics, are also doing extensive research in Iceland; mainly about symptoms of heart disease and osteoarthritis.
       This project has several positive aspects. One major one that will most likely come in the near future, possibility sooner rather than later seeing how fast technology is progressing, is that new parents will be able to build the child they want; from hair colour to skin colour. But that is what makes it dangerous. What I mean by dangerous is, everything that makes us as individuals will now be on paper, and that will just make discrimination easier, and easier for those type of people to say “See?! We ARE different inside!” Personally, I think some things should stay mysteries and unknown to the human mind. I leave you with a clip of a movie “Gattaca,” in which the parents are paying a visit to a geneticist.

​       Please feel free to comment on what you thought of the blog, or other physical anthropological subjects you would like me to cover.
0 Comments

Methods and Medicine 

1/3/2016

0 Comments

 
       When we think of medicine nowadays a pill or a liquid to be measured out comes to mind. But what would come to the minds of prehistoric humans? In the following blog I will address a method we still use and a recent finding of who also used medical plants.
       I am sure you have heard of Shamans, now they are seen as crazy, full of unnecessary knowledge and superstition. That may be how we see them, but in the time before modern doctors, they were the person to run to if you or a family member had something as small as a headache. A method, that began in the Neolithic period, is a method we still use today, albeit not as frequently as we did 100 years ago. This method is named trepanation, which consists of cutting a hole in the skull (there is evidence of this practice from all over the world). Seeing how we as a species have always been violent, the head was a section that has been targeted in battle throughout the centuries, and this was no different for the prehistoric humans. The removing of shattered skull or to remove blood that had seeped into the skull was one of the first suggested reasons they would go through the pain of trepanation, which was then seen as an emergency surgery (they had no such thing as anesthesia). With the lack of modern cutting implements, they had to use stone tools. Most likely using the same ones they would use for skinning an animal, probably made of flit of obsidian (a good number of modern surgeons actually prefer obsidian surgical tools mostly because no rust and feel they are more exact with the obsidian blade).

       It is ironic how in prehistoric times, they had good reason to go through that pain, but as the ages and humans progressed, the practice of trepanation became an almost everyday operation, especially in the Middle Ages. In this time period, most everything they felt rooted from problems with the brain, they would open the skull to fix it. These problems varied from seizures to releasing a ghost from in the skull. Now, having a hole cut into the skull sounds like eventual death from the operation, but in fact we have evidence of those who were able to heal after and some, whose problems were not all gone, had several
trepanation operations. There were of course casualties, but if this operation meant imminent death, I am sure they would have stopped centuries ago. This healing of the skull is also evident when we just started in the Neolithic period. In modern times, we still use trepanation, but it is nowhere as frequent as it was years ago (examples below; on the left is an example of one who died in or around surgery, on the right is a healed skull).
Picture
Picture
       But what of those who were not human, did they have something as outlandish as trepanation? I am pleased to say, there is no evidence of it before the Neolithic period. In fact, the concern of what was happening under the skin and looking for ways to make it better is not reserved for Homo sapiens. Recently, in the 2012, there was a study of the diet of Neanderthal's by scraping their teeth. What was found, was not expected. The scraping, of course, show an abundance of meats and proteins, but also plants; medical plants. They ate several plants for the taste, but there were a few that have no nutritional value, Not only did some of plants they ate have no nutritional value, but several Neanderthals would have found them bitter. “One case was particularly intriguing: The scrapings from an individual known as Adult 4 contained chemicals known as azulenes and coumarins. Those are the sorts of chemicals that are found in yarrow and chamomile, two types of herbal remedies. Yarrow is an astringent that's long been used to cleanse wounds when used externally, or counter internal bleeding when ingested.” And chamomile is best know in tea form for calming headaches and colds.
       
In the previous blog I posted (http://anthropologicalconcepts.weebly.com/blog/-primatology), I mentioned chimpanzees eating medical plants to calm stomach aches. Who would have thought that hundreds of years ago, Neanderthals were eating those types of plants as well. What is more, who would have thought hundreds of years ago, our ancestors went through excruciating pain just to feel better. Now we have so many medications at our fingertips. We maybe the most medicated generation, but look on the bright side, we are not the generation with the most trepanations.
​       
Please feel free to comment on what you thought of the blog, or other physical anthropological subjects you would like me to cover.


0 Comments

Primatology

12/27/2015

0 Comments

 
       In a previous blog (http://anthropologicalconcepts.weebly.com/blog/-physical-anthropology) I briefly mentioned primatology. But what exactly is primatology and what does a primatologist do? Furthermore, why are we spending so much time studying primates and why are physical anthropologists so interested in non-human primates? In the following blog I would like to discuss the matters these questions bring up.
       Primatology is the study of primates, from what they eat, mating patterns, and so on. The most famous primatologist, Jane Goodall, has opened so many new doors for this field. With the time she has spent with chimpanzees since the 1960's has not only contributed to primatology, but also has showed that chimpanzees and humans are not all that different. I have mentioned in an earlier blog (http://anthropologicalconcepts.weebly.com/blog/-diet-and-teeth) that chimpanzees are omnivoures, and that they hunt, but Goodall has studied and witnessed far more human traits in chimpanzees. Many think that humans are the only species that can show compassion, and for those who also show compassion have been taught by humans, but this is not the case for chimpanzees. In her time with the chimpanzees Goodall saw so many moments of compassion. For example, in 1987 she was witness to a female chimpanzee, Spindle, adopting an orphaned chimpanzee, Mel. Even thought Mel was not a close relative, Spindle took her under her wing when Mel's mother died of pneumonia. What is more, she has “
witnessed chimps performing a spontaneous dance-like display by waterfalls. Jane believes that this parallels expressions of awe that led early humans to religion.” There is also evidence with them eating medicinal plants when they have stomach aches or to “reduce internal parasites.”
       Now primatology is not limited to the study of chimpanzees. All of the research primatologists have conducted have deepened our understanding of our own roots. That is the reason physical anthropologists are so interested in non-human primates. In some of the studies primatologists conduct they compare how alike modern humans and modern non-human primates are. “For example, the way in which the brains of rhesus monkeys and humans are organized is similar.” The more we study these cousins of ours, the more we understand what makes us human.

       We may all be humans, but human, chimpanzee, gorilla, squirrel money, we are all primates. This is what makes physical anthropology such an exciting field. Anthropology is the study of humans, but to figure out what makes us human and how we got to being human requires extensive research about the past, but also the present. The Earth is pretty much already a planet of the apes. All different species, albeit all still very alike (humans and chimpanzees share 96 percent of their DNA).

       Please feel free to comment on what you thought of the blog, or other physical anthropological subjects you would like me to cover.
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    Author

    A recently made anthropologist who has been set loose to study the humans of the then, today, what's to come, and beyond. 

    Archives

    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.